The operators of the website Germany debate strive to improve the citizens' basic democratic political community. On the fundamental understanding of leadership according to the teachings of the ancient Greek philosophers, is used here in an almost folk-forming review referred. This is essential to an honest to lead debate, which may be the best form of government as well. On the occasion of this debate I would like to point out that is the question of "rule at all" into this debate, valuable standards for a legitimate and successful as possible "how" of supplies. For rule can only be legitimate if it uses. And not the ruler, but the social order.
An interesting look back into the world understanding
which is also fundamental for our present day. Here we now know and understand more. Once in the information age, we understand economics and sociology better today, the Viennese School also understand the general praxeology, you know the realities of cybernetics. Who now speaks of self-interest and common good, will ask today, where on the one hand the information for their determination and will to another, how these goals can be achieved. The inherent good of the individual can very well determine for themselves and achieve. (For a given freedom / given to be left alone and possible voluntary cooperation and means of resource accumulation easier faster and / or better.) But who can decide what benefits the community? And how is that community? Here, too, only the individual can articulate the common good, but he remains the individual and not the Community Go itself is a public benefit, there is not a personal being, feeling and achievement, expression of the common good is idea, every striving of the common good is happening under the cybernetic terms of the control distance, regardless of the Regulatory King, government, Democrat or tyrant: This provides an always for others, not for himself Or more determined for all (of whatever created Commonwealth), but the fact does nothing, except that the foreign regulation is now total.
Despite the distinction between decision-making and executive power remains both common that the object is a strange and distant is: The people of a community, no matter whether they are governed or "govern itself," determined not to himself but about others. So here anticipating possible so not often. This is true of the will and as for the executive. Anticipation is best if I limit myself to my goals and my property and if I wear the consequences of my act and omission, and even irresponsible. It is safe to everyone how little it "politics" manages to achieve what it seeks. Aristotle's preference of a Constitution and contrary to democracy stems from the fact that they rule instead of limited stretches. Today it is important to recognize and take into account a result that anticipating the best condition even under the conditions of the cybernetic system is distance.
Community law
This is also a question of law: it is often required (an absurdity: Who calls for a law, already a slave ) and often frivolous merely postulated. In fact, recognizes the best possible legal regulation of conflicts of interest. Looks so right to be essentially non-profit. This can only be worn by individuals. The force of successful anticipation is for the individual in freedom and responsibility. Who wants to donate the common good, who studied law in the rules, respect the personal well-being, because the self-determination a Lead in the scheme has distance to the foreign destination. The first-person perspective of the libertarian self-ownership is based on , do not recognize that socialists generally. The suspected reason: They want the other use for themselves. On the community-oriented man who is looking for and educated communities given a legitimate social order, may now know why he respects the inherent good of each individual and how he achieved public benefit. A rule of law as a state of law, as the best constitution is - in the Aristotelian sense - as opposed to a democracy that is always socialism. To the reasons we know today all because of findings of cybernetics and praxeology. It is the task of the 21st and the upcoming 22nd his century, exploring possibilities of implementation of these findings and to weigh.
phenomenal: each socialism his sociology
accuracy: anticipation rather than participation
