prevails in a democracy the majority. This means that what most want is for all those states that do all have to do what only the most. Even if this majority is clear from the people, that fact remains totalitarian. The Democrats claim for themselves that this was better than everybody do what he wants, what they talk bad as anarchy, as did the personal dictators too. They forget that everyone is owned by someone, they see in their ethnic or national socialism, the individual and the property. In an ownership society, everyone do what he wants, but must confine his caprice on his own, while the Democrats their opinions all rush with violence on his neck. You do not pay attention to individuals or property of: What do most of their names right.
The market, which is a free, allows individuals to cooperate, act to improve them by, go and inform their situation and that of their partners. Each individual will only act on the boundaries of his self and his property when he sees an advantage - just as his partner. So loosely they can both be improved. This occurs in numerous collaborations in various ways. These Chains have their own order: the market.
By Exaggerated or false taught, or brazen power-hungry people but not now seek their advantage in the open cooperation that is mutually advantageous, but allow themselves - often with the most beautiful words - a unilateral advantage by force. They rob, steal and cheat, they disregard the rights of the individual and the organization. Even your help they challenge of stolen goods and stolen money. Worth to now be a democracy in which all this is even the law, legal, free and listed in order? If those who seek a government request handler and perpetrators of violence to govern? Or rather, they determine not false rhetoric, to know how to steal on their behalf, to rob necessary, and even kill? Law and order dim in a democracy, advantageous cooperation are difficult and rare, the progress does not find its way.
Governments are now creating their policy, they may gradually stop by custom and instruction for the only possible one. They fear any change as a step in the mess and keep the mistakes of the current order is unfortunate but unalterable. The whole society has become unfree.
Modern Western States, who are democracies examined, the rule of yet ordered by governments to limit that they gave themselves a Constitution *. It sought to limit the evil of the dictation of the majority in that they may not vote on anything and private spaces remain. They sought to defuse the violence monopoly through a separation of powers. In fact, now brings together not a ruler of all powers in one person up. However, this was never like this: No man has such power in his mortal body. It took legal entities, should have faith in the majority and believe in order to appear as a force in three persons. This secularization of the Christian Trinity doctrine based not for nothing that the modern Western state. And the religious majority may finally their violent acts against other law and order hot. Private rooms are not, everything is all settled legally and orderly.
And yet there is this uncomfortable feeling that something is wrong: that the mercy of the masses ** creates injustice and the individual is lost. The opinion of the majority prevails and the individual submits to or extends even further behind. It is not even sure if the prevailing opinion is it still the most: public opinion is manipulated, falling voter turnout. It is also a questionable choice to be able to say in the wallet of my neighbor, judge his actions and omissions to , But can lose one's will over my self and his work and creativity. I choose no longer legally and free of my partners, I decide not even about myself and my property, but constantly listen to the voice of the powerful majority, they may tolerate me and my work. The forgotten man to walk upright.
order to get back from the horizontal to the vertical, it requires a reconsideration of the order of things and being. A recognition of the freedom of man and the conditions for its peaceful and cooperative coexistence. Not the egalitarian fawning is the horizontal people-friendly. No human being is unique. Precisely why people have been working together at all times with each other and turn their eyes upward. They think the true rule in heaven and act on earth. The promise of heaven on earth have always taken to hell. The claim the Allgemeinnutz, sell off the net well. Self-interest and common good but to go hand in hand. We need this freedom. Only the Free is for personal well-being, which is being forced Forced therefore to take a disadvantage. Here and there, the countless individual acts add up to a total situation: forced to deterioration and shifting from one to another. To an improvement in freedom for both. Therefore proceed on freer societies retard and compulsive. Progressive socialism but that robs the individual the freedom to steal, in the end all to act on their behalf, they claim. Democracy is such a socialist, and an equally evil Sames. Slower than the Communism it leads to disaster, but it remains the same direction and it is of the same kind
Only when the individual himself recognizes, averts his eyes from the pretensions and impositions of the whole or only those of a majority, but creates for himself and his partner, may again arise progress and improvement. Those who believe that unilateral taking advantage may result in total goods, are wrong. Because no state does something, the responsible majority to do so. It actually comes in on each individual, his freedom and his advantage. Here, advantage and profit add up to general progress and welfare. This can have. One must know. And do.
* Friedrich August von Hayek: The Constitution of Liberty
** Gustave Le Bon: psychology of the masses
slightly revised version of the first release on liberty.li 15.10.2007 .
0 comments:
Post a Comment